"Imagine there's no Countries ... It is not hard to do" statistics new zealand - "Imagine there were no states. It is not hard "- John Lennon sang. In fact it is difficult. Then, how to organize? A nation state is an institution of natural and inevitable? Or is a dangerous anachronism in a globalized world?
Try for a moment statistics new zealand to imagine a world without countries. Imagine a map not divided into colored shapes, each with clear boundaries, with government laws. Try to describe everything that makes our society - trade, travel, science, statistics new zealand sport, preservation of peace and security - not to mention the states. Try to describe statistics new zealand yourself: You have the right to at least one citizenship, and the right to change, but not the right to having statistics new zealand none at all.
These colorful shapes on the map can be democracy, dictatorship, or too chaotic statistics new zealand to be either of these, but almost all claim to be one thing: a nation state, the sovereign territory of a "people" or nation have the right to self-determination within an autonomous state. So say the United Nations, which now number 193 such. And more and more people want their own state, that the Scots to vote for independence, to the jihadists who preach a new state in the Middle East. Many of the biggest news today, that the conflict in Gaza and Ukraine, to the immigration disputes and membership in the European statistics new zealand Union, statistics new zealand are connected in some way with the nation states. Even at a time when our economies are globalizing, nation statistics new zealand states remain the main political institution of the planet. The large number of votes for nationalist parties in this year's elections for the EU prove that nationalism statistics new zealand remains alive - even if the EU tries to overcome. However, there is a growing sense among economists, political scientists and even national governments that the nation state is not necessarily the best rate on which our affairs proceed. We can manage vital issues as food supplies and climate on a global scale, however, hinder statistics new zealand national agendas repeatedly global good. On a smaller scale, local and regional administrations often seems better serve the people, rather than national governments. Then, how to organize? A nation state is an institution of natural and inevitable? Or is a dangerous anachronism in a globalized world? These are normally scientific questions - but this is changing. The complexity theorist, social scientists and historians are addressing with new techniques, and answers are not always those that can be expected. There is no nation timeless phenomenon. He is later. And while growing complexity comes in, he is mutated, then conversion to the new political structure. Be ready for neo-mesjetarizmin. Before the late 18th century nation states had not really, says John Breuilly the London School of Economics. If you travel through Europe, require no passport at the border; did not exist and neither limit nor passports, as we know them today. People have ethnic and cultural identities, but they do not actually define political entity where they lived. It goes back in time in anthropology and psychology of early mankind policy. We started as a stray extended family, then formed large groups of hunters, and later, about 10 thousand years ago, was decided in the villages of farmers. statistics new zealand Alliance had advantages statistics new zealand such adjustment as people collaborate to nourish and protect. War and peace But there were limits. statistics new zealand Robin Dunbar, Oxford University has shown that an individual can pursue social interactions statistics new zealand that connect no more than 150 people. Evidence for this includes studies of villages and military units throughout history, as well as the average number of friends on Facebook. But there was an important reason to have more friends than that: war. "In small companies, between 10 to 60 percent of male deaths are due to the war," says Peter Turchin of the University of Connecticut statistics new zealand in Storrs. The more allies you had meant you had more chances to survive. Turchin has revealed that ancient empires grew Eurasian where fights were stronger, which implies that the war was a major factor in political expansion. Archaeologist Ian Morris of Stanford University argues that as the population grew, people can not find vacant land where you can escape enemies. Losers of simple përthitheshin battles in the holdings of the enemy - so these holdings grew even more. As the number of Dunbarit pass? Universal response of humanity was the invention of hierarchy. Many villages alliance made between them under a chair; several mayors joined together under a larger head. To grow, these alliances added more villages,