Post-Civ!: Thorough treatment | The free-spirited
This paper is largely based framework that is in place post-Civ brochure! , Which can be obtained free of charge from the website 'Stranger in a Tangled Wilderness'. Despite its brevity, this is an excellent brochure to promote ine bolivia critical thinking anarchist. But it's short. Thus, the aim of this work to be found there, and the idea to merge them with a plethora of additional information to be consistent and thorough review ine bolivia of post-civilization from the spirit and activities. It is not intended to be neither exhaustive nor complete a comprehensive reliable teatmeallikas post-civ theory, but it is planned to put into place a robust and comprehensive basis for further discussion and to inspire more activity. Post-Anarchism Line of civilization is nothing more than the synthesis of thesis and antithesis in the name of Primitive Society called Civilization. This means that it is a mixture of already ine bolivia existing good things. Their quest for good things from the past that must be dug out mäetäis crap. The first part is done precisely that, offering a critique of primitive societies, primitivistide, civilized societies and civilizations advocates. The second part will take the best ideas of the past found in the forms of society and practices and weaves them together into one larger Post-Civ philosophy. The third part is a further explanations and includes words, a list of references, and some recommended reading.
To build a better society in the future, it is vitally important that we deconstruct the societies of the past, to take over the best ideas and practices, what they offer, and you were to throw away trash. There seems to be a sensible start by tearing apart communities and primitive peoples primitivistliku check out the philosophy of the strong and weak points. Primitive society and the opposition in the interests of a civilized society is essentially a pseudo-dilemma. This means that the two do not need to be opposite; are both positive and negative elements. Yet, all of us are taught that we grow up in Western civilization, the universe is everything ine bolivia (except the Absolutes of God and Country) duality and every thing has its opposite: ine bolivia good against poor, black against white, man against woman, day and night against the Yin and Yang, wealth and poverty, terrorism and democracy. This kind of thinking of simplified (which we will continue to ridicule and disprove later) puts many anarchists and anti-authoritarian to believe that because they hate civilization, then they need to make their idols instead of a primitive society and try it again kehtsestada. This is the logic of his very bad form. Did primitive societies are totally bad? No. Is primitivism is completely wrong? No. In fact, as the reader sees the hereafter is much more Post-Civ anarchism Green anarchism and not at all related to pirmitivismi sündikalismi if, for example, and other schools of anarchism with. However, primitivism and primitive societies, there are a number of unresolved problems, which is not really on the egalitarian, oppression-free society. Begin by looking into allegations anarho-primitivistide. ine bolivia Anarho-primitivistid say: To have a lifestyle based on hunting and gathering better and more sustainable than their agrikultuuri that most or all of the primitive ine bolivia peoples were / are nomadic hunter-gatherers. Therefore, we should strive to be nomadic hunter-gatherers. That oppression is inherently caused by civilization, and civilization is a symptom, and that most or all tribal cultures are inherently egalitarian and non-oppressive. Therefore, we can and should try to stop the oppression in this way to return to a primitive situation. To the hierarchy, warfare, enslavement of women and patriarchy occur together with the advent of civilization. Therefore, in order to root out these evils, we need to go back to a primitive society. To the primitive warfare, if it occurs, is less intense, more ritualistic and less lethal, less brutal, less frequently, and socially less devastating than civilized ine bolivia warfare. So is the primitive societies desirable for those who prefer peace. That the tools and technology (a term primitivistid often poorly defined, if at all) is inherently oppressive, and therefore should get rid of them. That science is a religion, which has no reality base ("scientism"), and that we should therefore discard science and its principles. Since symbolic thinking - language, literacy, numbers, time, and so on form - is inherently ine bolivia oppressive, and should therefore be abandoned.
Anyone thinking of them primitivistliku pillars standing on a weak foundation and is easily refuted. First of all, we can say that the idea that all primitive peoples is or has been a nomadic hunter-gatherers, without exception, is simply not true. Many of the non-T
This paper is largely based framework that is in place post-Civ brochure! , Which can be obtained free of charge from the website 'Stranger in a Tangled Wilderness'. Despite its brevity, this is an excellent brochure to promote ine bolivia critical thinking anarchist. But it's short. Thus, the aim of this work to be found there, and the idea to merge them with a plethora of additional information to be consistent and thorough review ine bolivia of post-civilization from the spirit and activities. It is not intended to be neither exhaustive nor complete a comprehensive reliable teatmeallikas post-civ theory, but it is planned to put into place a robust and comprehensive basis for further discussion and to inspire more activity. Post-Anarchism Line of civilization is nothing more than the synthesis of thesis and antithesis in the name of Primitive Society called Civilization. This means that it is a mixture of already ine bolivia existing good things. Their quest for good things from the past that must be dug out mäetäis crap. The first part is done precisely that, offering a critique of primitive societies, primitivistide, civilized societies and civilizations advocates. The second part will take the best ideas of the past found in the forms of society and practices and weaves them together into one larger Post-Civ philosophy. The third part is a further explanations and includes words, a list of references, and some recommended reading.
To build a better society in the future, it is vitally important that we deconstruct the societies of the past, to take over the best ideas and practices, what they offer, and you were to throw away trash. There seems to be a sensible start by tearing apart communities and primitive peoples primitivistliku check out the philosophy of the strong and weak points. Primitive society and the opposition in the interests of a civilized society is essentially a pseudo-dilemma. This means that the two do not need to be opposite; are both positive and negative elements. Yet, all of us are taught that we grow up in Western civilization, the universe is everything ine bolivia (except the Absolutes of God and Country) duality and every thing has its opposite: ine bolivia good against poor, black against white, man against woman, day and night against the Yin and Yang, wealth and poverty, terrorism and democracy. This kind of thinking of simplified (which we will continue to ridicule and disprove later) puts many anarchists and anti-authoritarian to believe that because they hate civilization, then they need to make their idols instead of a primitive society and try it again kehtsestada. This is the logic of his very bad form. Did primitive societies are totally bad? No. Is primitivism is completely wrong? No. In fact, as the reader sees the hereafter is much more Post-Civ anarchism Green anarchism and not at all related to pirmitivismi sündikalismi if, for example, and other schools of anarchism with. However, primitivism and primitive societies, there are a number of unresolved problems, which is not really on the egalitarian, oppression-free society. Begin by looking into allegations anarho-primitivistide. ine bolivia Anarho-primitivistid say: To have a lifestyle based on hunting and gathering better and more sustainable than their agrikultuuri that most or all of the primitive ine bolivia peoples were / are nomadic hunter-gatherers. Therefore, we should strive to be nomadic hunter-gatherers. That oppression is inherently caused by civilization, and civilization is a symptom, and that most or all tribal cultures are inherently egalitarian and non-oppressive. Therefore, we can and should try to stop the oppression in this way to return to a primitive situation. To the hierarchy, warfare, enslavement of women and patriarchy occur together with the advent of civilization. Therefore, in order to root out these evils, we need to go back to a primitive society. To the primitive warfare, if it occurs, is less intense, more ritualistic and less lethal, less brutal, less frequently, and socially less devastating than civilized ine bolivia warfare. So is the primitive societies desirable for those who prefer peace. That the tools and technology (a term primitivistid often poorly defined, if at all) is inherently oppressive, and therefore should get rid of them. That science is a religion, which has no reality base ("scientism"), and that we should therefore discard science and its principles. Since symbolic thinking - language, literacy, numbers, time, and so on form - is inherently ine bolivia oppressive, and should therefore be abandoned.
Anyone thinking of them primitivistliku pillars standing on a weak foundation and is easily refuted. First of all, we can say that the idea that all primitive peoples is or has been a nomadic hunter-gatherers, without exception, is simply not true. Many of the non-T
No comments:
Post a Comment